|
Marinella Paderni, curator of Lapsus announced the
three winning projects, on
16 May during the exhibition opening at fsmgallery, Florence, Italy.
First Prize € 1.000: Arkadia I, Victoria Ahrens
Second Prize € 500: The Sicilian Family, Emilio Vavarella
Third Prize € 500: Maria, Nathalie Dallies
Special mention:
Catturare l'Anima, Roberto Dapoto
Kuonesa_Beyond Seeing, Cornelia Mittendorfer
The 15 finalist projects, will be exhibited at fsmgallery from 16 May to 15 June 2013. The selection
was curated by Elena Ceratti, Martin Breindl and Silvio Wolf:
VIDEO
Be aware, Giuglia
Hymn to Xochiquetzal, peterbill.us
Maria, Nathalie Dallies
Penelope as a Verb, Cher Brown
The sun set faster, Shira Liberty
PHOTOGRAPHY
Arkadia I, Victoria Ahrens
Catturare l'Anima, Roberto Dapoto
Cinema El Alihal, Gloria Oyarzabal
Immenso, Karina Zen
Kuonesa_Beyond Seeing, Cornelia Mittendorfer
Lapsus Autoscatto, Elisabetta Roan
Light Shapes, Michaela Talia Limberis
Pratingphotography, Ilona Stanska
Ruined Polaroids, William Miller
The Sicilian Family, Emilio Vavarella
Lapsus is an open call for photographic and video works, curated by the Italian
art critic Marinella Paderni, and is organised
by Fondazione Studio Marangoni and
Celeste Network.
Lapsus reflects on the ways in which works of art are created,
especially in relation to new media, photography and video, which allow
artists ever more technical and virtual perfection, at the risk of losing
authenticity and uniqueness.
History of art shows us that many works were born of accidental 'mistakes'
which occurred during the execution of a project, the taking of a picture or
the recording of a video; such slips or lapsus' often occur without the
knowledge of the author, who can use them as a point of strength in the final
work.
This project also explores the idea of fate and destiny in
relation to an artist and his or her artwork, dispelling the myth that a
technological slip, error or failure can be determined or planned, instead
elevating them to an aesthetic image that is a work of art.
Theme
What role does a random accident, a 'fortunate' error, a bizarre
involuntariness or the failure of an idea, have in the success of a work of
art? In the age of Photoshop and digital technology, what value does an
'error' have, that unplanned mistake that escapes the consciousness of the
artist as he creates his work, but enriches and decrees its success?
Lapsus investigates the positive and constructive values of an accidental
photographic or video error, an un-sought-for error, that at the time of its
occurrence decides the fate of a work or a project. The practice of 'errata'
in photography and cinema is as old as their own invention: Man Ray used the
neologism Fautographie to nickname the photographic error, while Diane Arbus
stated that "... is important to make bad photographs." Zoe Leonard
has dedicated to this concept a recent series of photographs (see series of
'Sun Photographs') which look directly at the sun, an 'error' that even
newcomers to photography would not have stumbled on, but explained by the
American artist as an attempt to photograph a subject impossible to portray. The
historian of photography Clément Chéroux has written a book that examines the
history of the photographic error in the development of photography.
The project Lapsus takes into consideration all those photographic and
video works in which an accident during their execution, a sudden and
unintended erasure, an unexpected détournement during development of a work,
or conversely, the research of an impossibility (as in the case of Zoe
Leonard) lead to the success of a work of art.
Results of 'Like' Lapsus draw on FB
The following photographers who participated in the 'Like' Lapsus draw on
Facebook receive a free entry to Celeste Prize 2013: Enrica Caula, Stefano Gizzi,
William Goodwin, Luca Lupi and Yen-Ting Cho.
|
Comments (92)
Buon fortuna tutti
sono d'accordo con te in tutto quel che dici ma faccio una precisazione io parlo del "semplice" fatto che la giuria avrebbe dovuto "attenersi" al tema del concorso (parametro oggettivo) e poi dar libero sfogo ai propi gusti (parametro soggettivo).
Quando tra centinaia di lavori viene fatta una selezione così concentrata, ti aspetti venga fuori l'eccellenza, qualcosa o qualcuno da cui imparare..
Le mie aspettative attendono ancora l'eccellenza..
mi piace.
vediamo se lo staff accetta la proposta.
Non ti nascondo che anch’io avevo individuato altri lavori splendidi, in linea con il tema, e mi aspettavo di vederli fra i selezionati.
Che cosa dici di proporre allo staff, che ovviamente sta leggendo, di attivare un voto di preferenza online, dove solo i partecipanti al premio hanno diritto di giudizio? Anche senza premi in denaro, credo che sia un’opportunità di confronto.
Chissà, forse sceglieremmo, a maggioranza, gli stessi artisti selezionati dalla giuria, per errore…
Non fraintendetemi sono comunque bellissime opere e non me ne vogliano gli autori.
Ho avuto modo di osservare con grande piacere lavori incredibili e perfettamente in linea con il tema.
Non sono un critico e non mi permetto di giudicare tantomeno il lavoro di altri ma leggendo qualche commento fatto in precedenza su questo argomento mi trovo d'accordo in particolare con un artista che diceva:
" ....spero che la giuria nella selezione finale delle opere si attenga al tema "lapsus" altrimenti era meglio lasciare il tema libero...."